Mendix vs. OutSystems: A Strategic Comparison of Low-Code Leaders

The comparison of key aspects while choosing between leading low-code development platforms: Mendix and OutSystems.
Share on social media

The low-code application development market has surged significantly, driven by enterprise demand for faster, agile, and more scalable software solutions. Among the most recognized low-code platforms are Mendix and OutSystems, both of which offer robust features suited for enterprise-grade applications.

This comparison explores key aspects including architecture, pricing, deployment flexibility, developer capabilities, AI integration, and enterprise-grade governance and security of both leading software development platforms - Mendix and OutSystems.

1. Long-Term Commitment and Stability

Mendix: Stable, Siemens-Backed Platform

Mendix is strongly backed by Siemens, ensuring stable financial and strategic support. Siemens’ commitment provides enterprises confidence in Mendix’s continuous evolution and sustainability.

Outsystems: owned by private investors

Siemends solid Mendix backing contrasts with OutSystems, whose market valuation dropped significantly in 2023, raising concerns about its long-term stability and future strategy. This is fuelled even more given its business model primarily funded by investors, like private equity firm KKR, whose main goal is to generate attractive returns for their clients.

2. Platform Architecture

Mendix: Unified, Cloud-Native Architecture

Mendix offers a single, unified, cloud-native architecture designed explicitly to support the full software development lifecycle - from ideation to deployment - without fragmentation. This consistency significantly simplifies both development and maintenance, creating sustainable foundations for growth and expansion.

OutSystems: Fragmented Platforms

Conversely, OutSystems operates two incompatible low code platforms: OS11 (WindowsVMs-based) and ODC (Linux containers-based). The introduction of ODC has introduced significant challenges, including incompatibility with existing components, migration hurdles, and uncertainty around future support for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

3. Pricing Transparency and Predictability

Mendix: Transparent and Straightforward Pricing Structure

Mendix's pricing is predictable, structured around platform packages and user licenses, clearly outlining deployment costs. This approach enables enterprises to budget effectively, attributing costs transparently and avoiding surprises during contract renewal.

OutSystems: Complex and Unpredictable Pricing

OutSystems' pricing model, based on users, application objects (AOs), and servers, is complicated and often unpredictable. It can lead to unforeseen expenses and suboptimal architectural choices, resulting in budget overruns and costly surprises during renewals affecting business growth.

4. Deployment Flexibility

Mendix: Multi-Cloud, On-Premises, and Edge Deployment

Cloud native since 2016, Mendix provides full flexibility, enabling deployment across public clouds, private clouds, edge, on-premises, and even air-gapped environments. This flexibility is ideal for all - small companies and business looking for easy deployment options, and for enterprises with strict compliance requirements or complex hybrid infrastructure strategies. Weather it is SAP, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Kubernetes, Docker, RedHat or other – infrastructure decision is yours.

OutSystems: Limited Cloud Deployment Options

OutSystems’ new ODC architecture restricts deployments exclusively to AWS public cloud, significantly limiting enterprises’ options. Additionally, ODC lacks a downloadable runtime, making deployments outside its PaaS- managed infrastructure impossible.

5. Developer Experience and Version Control

Mendix: Git-Based, Collaborative Version Control

Mendix supports industry-standard Git-based version control, allowing multiple developers to work concurrently. Mendix also enables detailed element-level version tracking and provides local debugging, significantly enhancing developer productivity and reducing integration conflicts.

OutSystems: Lacking Advanced Version Control

OutSystems lacks element-level commit history and branching capabilities. Developers commit to a central server without effective concurrent workflow support, significantly limiting collaborative efficiency and complicating debugging processes.

6. AI Capabilities and Smart Applications

Mendix: Fully Integrated AI Development

Thanks to Maia, Mendix AI assistant, Mendix integrates AI deeply into the platform, providing continuous guidance and generation throughout the entire software development process. Mendix supports embedding ML models through ML kit and constructing advanced agentic AI applications within the platform itself, offering dedicated, secure LLM instances (e.g. OpenAI, Amazon Bedrock and others).

OutSystems: Limited AI Integration

OutSystems primarily relies on external AI APIs and lacks embedded capabilities for complex multi-agent workflows. Its architectural approach - utilizing two separate editors - further restricts iterative development and integration with AI-driven workflows.

7. Mobile Application Development

Mendix: Robust Native Mobile Support

Mendix utilizes React Native, delivering high-performance, consumer-grade mobile experiences backed by a large and active developer community. This provides superior performance, maintainability, and offline capabilities compared to hybrid solutions.

OutSystems: Hybrid Framework Dependency

OutSystems continues to rely on hybrid frameworks like Cordova and Ionic.These frameworks, although viable, provide inferior performance, higher maintenance costs, and slower community-driven innovation compared to React Native, making it harder to support.

8. Process Automation and Workflow Integration

Mendix: Native Workflow Capabilities

Mendix seamlessly integrates workflow automation directly within its primary platform, empowering businesses to define complex processes involving human and automated tasks effortlessly.

OutSystems: Separate Workflow Tools

OutSystems handles workflows using separate tools, posing challenges in workflow integration, governance, debugging, and real-time collaboration. This fragmented approach complicates process automation and limits responsiveness to business changes.

9. Security and Governance

Mendix: Embedded Security and Governance

Mendix automatically integrates enterprise-grade security and governance, providing comprehensive application oversight, audit trails, and built-insecurity controls, including row-level security.

OutSystems: Manual and Limited Security Controls

OutSystems security requires manual coding and lacks comprehensive built-insecurity governance. Notably, OS11 does not provide row-level security, increasing potential vulnerabilities and compliance concerns.

10. Avoiding Vendor Lock-in

Mendix: Open and Portable Models

Mendix stores application models openly, allowing secure external access and providing long-term flexibility without risking model deletion or loss.

OutSystems: Proprietary Lock-in

OutSystems' approach relies heavily on proprietary, generated code with limited model export capabilities, potentially leaving enterprises dependent on continued OutSystems platform usage to retain application functionality.

Conclusion: Why Mendix is the Preferred Choice

When evaluating all aspects, Mendix stands out clearly as the strategically superior low-code platform. Its Siemens-backed long-term stability, unified architecture, seamless developer experience, embedded AI capabilities, transparent pricing, and robust security and governance collectively position Mendix as the ideal choice.

Conversely, OutSystems might not be the preferred choice for enterprises seeking long-term solutions due to its fragmented architecture, unpredictable pricing, limited deployment options, lack of robust embedded AI assistance and automation capabilities, and ongoing uncertainties around low-code platform continuity and vendor stability.

While technology solutions lie at the heart of modern businesses, the choice of development technology must directly support the organization’s bottom line goals. Effective technologies facilitate seamless collaboration among business teams, IT departments, and development partners, enabling faster time-to-market, responsive adjustments to customer needs, and consistent delivery of tangible business outcomes. Ultimately, the technology selected can significantly influence long-term profitability and competitiveness, given that technology decisions are inherently complex and costly to reverse.

For organizations prioritizing future-proof, scalable, and secure digital transformation, Mendix represents not just a technology choice, but a strategic partner in sustained business success.

Read more